ACT is proposing a tougher, values-based reset of New Zealand’s immigration system, arguing the current model has drifted from skilled migration into a “general-purpose labour tap” that is straining infrastructure and public confidence.

Unveiling a six-point plan on Sunday, ACT leader David Seymour said the party wanted an immigration system that “welcomes people, but only if they share values of tolerance, freedom and democracy, help build infrastructure, and play by the rules.”

“New Zealand is a settler society… built by people willing to make a journey to try and build something better,” Seymour said. “But today, something doesn’t quite feel right with immigration. ACT believes those suspicions are correct.”

The party’s policy package focuses on stricter enforcement, tighter skills targeting, and requiring migrants to make a clearer upfront contribution to the country.

ACT would also overhaul the Accredited Employer Work Visa system by forcing skill categories to expire annually unless there is clear evidence of ongoing labour shortages.

Other measures include a five-year stand-down from welfare for new residents, a $6-a-day infrastructure levy on temporary work visa holders, and expanded English language requirements across most visa categories.

"That means no jobseeker support, accommodation supplement, or income-tested benefits for a migrant’s first five years here," Seymour said on May 3.

The party is also targeting compliance, proposing a dedicated overstayer enforcement unit and requiring gig economy platforms like Uber and DoorDash to verify workers’ visa status, with penalties for employers who breach the rules.

It is also proposing to deport resident visa holders convicted of serious offences carrying sentences of 10 years or more, regardless of how long they have lived in New Zealand – going further than the government’s current 20-year threshold.

Seymour said the policy was about “restoring the basic bargain” of immigration and rebuilding public trust, arguing successive governments had failed to enforce rules or align migration with infrastructure capacity.

“The rate of settlement has overwhelmed the ability to provide infrastructure,” he said, pointing to rapid population growth compared with the pace of public projects.